







 |
 |
Animal Experimentation /
Vivisection
Non-human animals are tortured by vivisectors to "test" various
products and medical research for the use of humans. Is it ever
necessary? NO. Why does it continue? Follow the money trail.
It's all about who is profiting, not who is saving human lives.
|
|
What is Vivisection ?
Vivisection is the dissection or practice of cutting into or otherwise
injuring living animals, especially for the purpose of scientific
research. Is it ever necessary? NO. The animal model is not accurate
and actually has held back medical science by consistently providing
faulty and unreliable data. Extensive research has brought to light
the fact that there has never been even one medical advancement that
has ever come from testing on an animal. Animal experimentation has
only after-the-fact "validated" the previous tests, but animal models have meaningfully
contributed to very few, if any, medical advancements.
1
Not only is the animal model not providing medical advancement, but
good cures are potentially being lost, as was almost the case with
penicillin. In 1929 when Alexander Fleming first tested penicillin
on rabbits, it was shown to be ineffective and was almost disregarded
as being useless to humans. Later, he administered penicillin to a
dying patient who had nothing left to loose. The patient lived and
the discovery of penicillin remains an important part of modern medicine.
Reactions of other animals to penicillin vary drastically. It causes
limb malformations in the offspring of rats and kills both guinea
pigs and hamsters. Fleming stated, "How fortunate we didn't have
these animal tests in the 1940s, for penicillin would probably never
been granted a license, and possibly the whole field of antibiotics
might never have been realized." 2
One Student's Perspective
Video footage from inside Carolina Biological, one of the world's
largest biological supply companies, displays the true atrocity and
utter cruelty of dissection: animals are harassed, injured, and killed
by jeering and insensitive employees. Many animals that are forced
into the gas chambers come out alive; cats are seen moving while on
the embalming table; live crabs and rats are painfully injected with
formaldehyde; an employee is seen drowning a rabbit for fun. Horrific
and unspeakable atrocities are committed in the name of science and
education at the expense of innocent lives. The only lesson that dissection
teaches students is the concept of regarding animals' lives as disposable
classroom objects. Respect for all life is a chief principle that
should be taught in life science classes. 3 Click
here for the full report.
What Animals Are Tortured for Vivisection ?
The most commonly used non-human animals tortured for vivisection
are birds, mice, and rats, which are used for 80-90% of vivisection.
4 Many other animals are also tortured for vivisection,
such as: monkeys (and other non-human primates), rabbits, dogs, cats,
guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs, frogs, horses, and farm animals.
Though most animals tested on in labs are birds, mice, and rats, they
are not protected at all under the Animal Welfare Act 4 due to a political
and controversial redefining of the word animal, resulting in their
exclusion from any protection.
[NOTE: Other animals NOT protected under the Animal
Welfare Act are animals used for food or fiber including livestock,
chickens, horses and sheep. 5 In other words, well over
10 billion animals yearly (in the U.S. alone) are not covered under
the Animal Welfare Act. Estimates are closer to 13-15 billion animals
yearly (just in the U.S.) have no protection at all... and this horrifying
annual number doesn't even include aquatic animals.]
Where Do The Animals Come From ?
Vivisected animals lead a life of pain and sadness when they become
a prisoner of vivisection. These animals are torn from their families,
bought from the "entertainment business" due to being viewed
as disposable or are reproduced specifically for vivisection by breeders.
Also, they are often stray animals taken from the streets they roam,
litters purchased from unsuspecting people, as well as animals obtained
through "free to good home" ads.
"Life" for Animals of Vivisection
Life for animals imprisoned in labs entails daily abuse. Animals are
typically caged in small, uncomfortable cells. Then, the unimaginable
is done to these animals: injected with HIV & AIDS, chemicals poured
into their eyes, forced to ingest lethal doses of substances through
a tube into their stomach or through a hole cut into their throats,
burned, organs removed, cancer & ulcers induced or implanted, or sliced
open for student use, usually with no pain killers. The list goes
on and on. These animals are continually experimented on until they
are no longer of use and then they are put to death. A small number
of animals are rescued from this torment, but most live out their
life suffering from confinement, lack of socialization, and the excruciating
pain of the vivisection.
Excuses for Vivisection
Vivisectionists and companies or organizations that employ vivisectionists,
such as the government, give various excuses for conducting these
experiments on live animals. For example, companies who manufacture
cosmetics and household products claim to need to test products on
non-human animals to be sure the products are safe for human animals.
Some organizations claim to need non-human animals to find cures for
human diseases. Little does the public know that these are not necessary
tests, there are alternatives to vivisection, which produce better,
faster, and more accurate results that are also much cheaper than
animal experimentation.
The only reason that animal experimentation still exists is purely
financial. Animal experimentation is a consistent source of funding
that researchers do not want to let go of, even if it means less productive
research toward finding cures for human health. Recent
studies have been done by American's for Medical Advancement (AFMA)
that traces the funding dollars. They found, "...a medical-research
system corrupt by lobbying groups, opportunistic scientists, irresponsible
drug companies, unlearned public officials, and clogged bureaucracies,
all profiting off the animal model's golden eggs." 6
When AFMA refers to animal research being a golden egg, it is due
to the fact that it is similar to the goose who laid a golden egg;
it is an unlimited source of money.
Who Pays for Vivisection ?
You do!!! When you purchase products or support charities that test
on animals. You are paying for the vivisection that was performed
to produce those products or paying a charity to fund vivisection
with your donation. Who else are you giving money to that will be
used for vivisection? The government. We all pay for the government
with our taxes. When you vote for government officials, you are voting
for people who will make laws. Those lawmakers are voting on whether
you will be paying for vivisection or not, how much or how little.
Alternatives to Vivisection
There are many ways to conduct reliable tests without torturing animals.
These alternatives are more dependable and trustworthy than tests
conducted on animals. Reliance on the faulty research that vivisection
produces has resulted in human illness and death. Alternatives to
animal tests are often less expensive, less time consuming and the
results are easier to decipher. Some of these tests are listed by
PETA in their Facts for Activists Notebook: "...cell cultures,
tissue cultures, corneas from eye banks, and sophisticated computer
and mathematical models. Companies can also formulate products using
ingredients already determined to be safe by the FDA." Too often
consumerism pushes companies to continually produce "new and
improved" products each year. Though these new and improved products
are only slightly different, they require new animal tests.
For a comprehensive list of alternatives to animal experimentation
for medical research and a thorough discussion of their benefits to
human health, take
a look at the research of American's for Medical Advancement (AFMA).
Then, if the fact that alternative's produce better results still
doesn't make you realize that using animals in research is not effective,
maybe you'd like to know about 50
Deadly Consequences of Lab Animal Experiments.
Who Else Knows That Using the Animal Model in Medical Research
is Harmful to Humans ?
Scientists, doctors, researchers, and anyone else who is keeping up
with the information in the latest scientific peer-reviewed journals.
That is the main reason why the public does not know. Deciphering
the scientific data can be overwhelming to those not in the medical
field, but it is common knowledge within the medical and scientific
community that reliance on the animal model in research is not useful
and is only done because the public has so much faith in it, though
completely unfounded.
Dr. Jane Goodall, PhD: "I have a growing conviction that
many animal data are not only obtained unethically, at huge cost in
animal suffering, but are also unscientific, misleading, wasteful
(in terms of dollars and effort) and may be actually harmful to humans."
"Animal experimentation is unethical and cruel. It hurts animals,
it is expensive, and it is so often detrimental to the very species
it professes to be helping - our own." 7
Dr. Ray Greek, MD and Dr. Jean Swingle Greek, DVM: "We
(human and non-human animals) differ on a cellular and molecular level,
and, importantly, that is where disease occurs." 8
"We were finding, through scientific research, that extrapolating
data from animals to humans is either misleading, unnecessary, dangerous,
or all three." 9
Dr. M. Beddow Bayly: "...medical authorities who set out
to support and defend the practice of experimenting on living animals
so far to distort historical facts as to create the impression in
the mind of the public that every single medical diagnosis and treatment
had depended for its discovery and application on vivisection... Happily,
even the briefest perusal of the available evidence shows falsity
of these claims and provides historical proof of the supreme value
of clinical observation..." 10
What Can I Do ?
This is something you have control of! You can save animals from needless
torture every single time that you go to the store and buy household
products. Only buy products that are not tested on animals. Only support
charities that do not test on animals. Look for the cruelty-free leaping
bunny emblem on the products you are purchasing. And, remember to
look for the Humane Charity Seal when choosing charities to give donations.
Also, living a healthy lifestyle with good nutrition, exercise, and
low stress will drastically help animals in an important way. If you
don't get sick, then you won't need to be treated with the drugs or
surgery techniques that were tested on animals.
Go online to PETA.org
and print a list of companies and charities that do not test on animals.
Other valuable web sites are Humane
Seal, Physician's Committee
for Responsible Medicine, and CureDisease.com
for further information.
You also have a say in what our government pays for. Educate yourself
on political issues regarding animals and vivisection. Write letters
to your senators and representative. You can find these legislators
by visiting www.vote-smart.org.
You can also view The
Humane Score Card on the HSUS website to find out how your elected
officials are voting on animal issues. If you like how they are voting
let them know. If you disagree with the way they are voting, write
them a letter, give them a call, or schedule a visit. These people
are working for you! Make sure they are doing a good job for you and
for the animals.
References
1 C. Ray Greek, MD and Jean Swingle Greek, DVM, "Sacred
Cows and Golden Geese: The Human Cost of Experimentation on Animals,"
The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd, 2000, pp. 17-19.
2 CureDisease.com, http://www.curedisease.com/FAQ.html.
3 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), "Classroom
Cut-Ups." This video can be seen at: http://www.petatv.com/viv.html
4 PETA reference to Orlans, F. Barbara, "Data on Animal
Experimentation in the United States: What They Do and Do Not Show,"
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 37, 2. Winter 1994.
5 Animal Welfare Act, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Section
2(g), online
pdf, 2002, p. 5.
6 CureDisease.com
and "Sacred Cows and Golden Geese," p. 19.
7 "Sacred Cows and Golden Geese," p. 11.
8 ibid, p. 16.
9 ibid, p. 17.
10 ibid, p. 18.
back to top
|
|

 |